Built by an engineer who watched review get rushed

On every team I’ve worked on, the same thing happened. Solid engineers shipped avoidable bugs, and every so often a credential went straight into the repo. Not carelessness — review is simply the first thing that gets compressed when a deadline is close. The reviewer skims the easy files, approves the large diff, and the off-by-one goes with it.

AI assistants have made that worse. Teams open more pull requests than any lead can read closely, and when a queue builds up, skimming is the rational response. The volume has outgrown the attention available.

So I built a reviewer that never gets tired and never skips the boring files, and that answers one question: how risky is this pull request? Low, merge it. High, look properly. Critical, it doesn’t merge at all. It doesn’t replace your reviewers — it makes sure nothing reaches them unchecked.

MicroReview is independent and bootstrapped. I read every support email, I ship what people actually ask for, and the roadmap follows real feedback rather than a sales quota. If you’re going to trust a tool with your source, you should know who wrote it and what they believe: your code is yours, only the files your pull request touches are ever read, and nothing is trained on.